Intelligent Design debate

[ehpg]

Natural History magazine

Three proponents of Intelligent Design (ID) present their views of design in the natural world. Each view is immediately followed by a response from a proponent of evolution (EVO). The report, printed in its entirety, opens with an introduction by Natural History magazine and concludes with an overview of the ID movement.

The authors who contributed to this Natural History report are:

* Richard Milner and Vittorio Maestro, ed. (introduction)
* Michael J. Behe, Ph.D. (ID) and Kenneth R. Miller, Ph.D. (EVO)
* William A. Dembski, Ph.D. (ID) and Robert T. Pennock, Ph.D. (EVO)
* Jonathan Wells, Ph.D. (ID) and Eugenie C. Scott, Ph.D. (EVO)
* Barbara Forrest, Ph.D. (overview)
http://www.actionbioscience.org/evolution/nhmag.html

(note: "Science requires positive evidence that biological complexity is intentionally designed." yet the same does not apply to Darwin's EVO)

Questioning evolution theory (Michael Behe)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7R5lfTPwct4

100 reasons why evolution is so stupid.(Kent Hovind)

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid ... 7272982882

Irreducible Complexity (bacterial flagellum) debunked

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K_HVrjKcvrU
very funny stuff the debunking of science with myth (note: the lack of explanation of all the individual parts and their respective functions)

other resources:
* Access Research Network http://www.arn.org/
* Intelligent Design and Evolution Awareness (IDEA) Center Online http://www.ideacenter.org/
* Intelligent Design Network http://www.intelligentdesignnetwork.org/
* intelligentdesign.org http://www.intelligentdesign.org/
* International Society for Complexity Information and Design http://www.iscid.org/


which is science and which is fiction?